GMAT Validity

October 26, 2011
Lucas Weingarten

In my Recruitment and Selection class at DePaul University, I am currently in the process of planning our fourth lesson on measurement in HR selection.  We will be covering concepts like criterion and predictors of on-the-job success, measurement scales (nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio), and validity.  Of course, this got me thinking about the GMAT as a selection tool designed to predict academic success in one’s first year of a master’s degree in business administration.1  As I did some digging around, I uncovered some alarming information about misuses of GMAT scores.  Namely, employers are using these scores as employment selection tools.

In order for a selection mechanism to be a valuable predictor of success, it must have empirical proof in the form of correlated data as to what attributes it is specifically designed to predict.  The GMAT has that data regarding its use by academic institutions to predict academic success.  There is absolutely no evidence for the GMAT to be used as a predictor for professional success, much less across an infinite array of occupations.

On the face of it, one can quite easily swallow the rationale: if you are a top scorer on a test designed to discern potentially successful MBA candidates, then it stands to reason that you are the type and quality of individual that a top company would be happy to recruit and, ultimately, select as one of its own.  Intuitively, it makes easy sense.  Here’s the problem: intuition is not enough.

In the 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Co., a very important precedent was set.  Duke Power had been using a high school diploma and a written test as selection tools for supervisory positions within the company.  Management is on record as saying these tools were used in order to increase the overall quality of the workforce.  That’s reasonable, right?  I mean, what’s wrong with requiring their incumbent supervisors to have a high school diploma and to successfully complete a written examination?  Intuitively, we all get it.  However, the Supreme Court ruled against Duke’s employment practices.

There are some significant social issues that are wrapped up in this court case, but those matters are not within the scope of our discussion here.  However, the precedent regarding selection tool validity that was born from the ruling is definitively within our focus.  In short, the high court said that companies are only allowed to measure the individual for the job, not the individual in the abstract.  This means that whatever selection mechanisms an organization employs must be directly and empirically connected to job-related attributes revealed by a thorough job analysis of a given position.

The use of the GMAT as such a selection tool is woefully inappropriate.  Sadly, though, because it appears to make such intuitive sense, I suspect the trend in its use by organizations looking to hire from a vast and varied candidate pool will only continue to rise.  That is, until someone gets sued.



Lucas Weingarten Lucas Weingarten is a full-time instructor for Kaplan Test Prep and he loves preparing GRE students for Test Day. The classroom is Lucas’ arena. When he cannot be found in one of Kaplan’s cage matches of learning, he is very likely dancing around DePaul University’s College of Commerce/Kellstadt Graduate School of Business in Chicago professing various courses offered by the Department of Management, up to and including monikers such as: “Managing for Effective and Ethical Organizational Behavior,” “Entrepreneurship Strategy,” “Strategic Managements and Analysis,” “Human Resource Management,” “Recruitment and Selection,” and “Foundations of Business Thought and Theory.” (Although that last one was cancelled just before the quarter started and he’s still not gotten over it.) Lucas spent most of his formative years in North Carolina, but hit the long road as soon as he was able. A world traveler with a currently expired passport, he has lived on and wandered around three continents with the expressed intention of finishing the job. He holds a BFA with a concentration in sculpture as well as an MBA with dual concentrations in Entrepreneurship and Finance. When not challenging standardized tests to a duel or wondering how to corrupt the business students of America, Lucas can be found brewing delicious beers, riding-then-fixing-then-riding his motorcycle, hanging out with dogs, pretending he’s a good cook, and feeling like the luckiest guy in the world to have such a fantastic wife and endlessly amazing young son. He’s in Milwaukee now, but is in Chicago often. Email him anytime about anything at:

About Kaplan Test Prep

We know test prep. We invented it. Through innovative technology and a personalized approach to learning, we’ll equip you with the test insights and advice you need to achieve your personal best. Results, guaranteed.*

Kaplan is accredited by the Accrediting Council for Continuing Education & Training (ACCET), a U.S. Department of Education nationally recognized agency. GMAT ® is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. Kaplan materials do not contain actual GMAT items and are neither endorsed by nor affiliated in any way with GMAC. Test names and other trademarks are the property of the respective trademark holders. None of the trademark holders are endorsed by nor affiliated with Kaplan or this website. *Higher Score Guarantee: Conditions and restrictions apply. For complete guarantee eligibility requirements, visit © Copyright Kaplan, Inc. All Rights Reserved.