#

November 1, 2011

The Chronicle (Duke University): “Law school applicants most likely to have Facebook checked”

The Daily Californian (University of California – Berkeley): “Social Networking”

NationalJurist.com: “Charlotte wins in South Africa; Law schools look at Facebook”

NationalJurist.com: “Law schools google and look at applicants Facebook page”

The Parthenon (Marshall University): “A public persona”

October 31, 2011

MSNBC.com: “Applying to grad schools? Clean up your Facebook”

The Daily Northwestern (Northwestern University): “Law school admissions use Facebook, Google to screen applicants, study finds”

The Daily Tar Heel (University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill): “Kenan-Flagler applicants more likely to be screened with social media at UNC”

The State News (Michigan State University): “Law schools take Facebook into account”

The Minnesota Daily (University of Minnesota – Minneapolis): “Law schools check Facebook for admissions”

Financial Times.com: “New GMAT means more work for aspiring MBAs”

October 28, 2011

The Daily Toreador (Texas Tech University): “More colleges use social networking to check applicants’ background”

The Daily Bruin (University of California – Los Angeles): “Study by Kaplan Test Prep found law schools look at social networking sites when evaluating applicants more often than other graduate schools”

October 27, 2011

The Daily Californian (University of California – Berkeley): “Law schools check digital trail of applicants more than other schools”

October 26, 2011

The Diamondback (University of Maryland): “Unlawful Profiles”

October 25, 2011

The Village Voice: “Rate My Professors Has Some Academics Up in Arms” 

The Independent Florida Alligator (University of Florida): “Survey shows some law schools review applicants’ online behavior”

The ABA Journal: “Law School Admissions Officers Are Googling Applicants and Checking Them Out on Facebook”

LockerGnome: “Applying to Law School This Year? Be Careful What You Post on Facebook”

Examiner.com: “Kaplan survey says admissions officers Googling applicants”

The Daily Record: “Clean up your digital trail, already”

Ms. JD: “Is Law School Admissions Becoming Creepy?” 

October 24, 2011

The Wall Street Journal Law Blog: “Remember: Law School Admissions Officers Are a Nosy Bunch”

Above The Law: “Non-Sequiturs”

The National Law Journal: “Another barrier to law school: an unsavory digital trail”

All Facebook: “1 In 3 Law Schools Eye Applicants’ Facebook Pages”

Today’s Chicago Woman: “The New GRE”

Kaplan Test Prep Survey Finds That Among Law School, Business School and College Admissions Officers, the Prevalence of Googling Applicants is Highest at Law Schools – By Far

41% of Law School Admissions Officers Google Applicants – compared to 20%
of College Admissions Officers and 27% of Business School Admissions Officers

Note to editors: Kaplan is a subsidiary of The Washington Post Company (NYSE: WPO)

Russell Schaffer, russell.schaffer@kaplan.com, 212.453.7538
Carina Wong, carina.wong@kaplan.com, 212.453.7571

New York, NY (October 24, 2011) – According to Kaplan Test Prep’s 2011 surveys of admissions officers at the top law schools, business schools and colleges across the U.S., those responsible for helping to produce tomorrow’s lawyers are by far the most likely to check out their prospective students’ digital trails.  According to Kaplan’s data*, 41% of law school admissions officers said they have Googled an applicant to learn more about them, while 37% have checked out an applicant on Facebook or other social networking site.  This compares with 20% of college admissions officers and 27% of business school admissions officers who have Googled an applicant.  For these populations, less than a quarter (24% of college admissions officers and 22% of business school admissions officers) have visited an applicant’s Facebook page.

Additionally, not only do law schools have the highest prevalence of admissions officers checking applicants’ digital trails, but also the highest prevalence of discovery of content damaging to applicants.  Nearly a third of admissions officers who researched an applicant online – 32% – said they discovered something that negatively impacted an applicant’s admissions chances.   In comparison, only 12% of college admission officers and 14% of business school admissions officers found something online that negatively impacted an applicant’s admissions chances.

“These findings make sense in context with what we consistently hear from law school admissions officers, which is that while admissions is based on high LSAT scores, strong GPAs and compelling personal statements, an overarching theme to the entire application is whether an applicant is able to exercise good judgment,”  said Jeff Thomas, director of pre-law programs, Kaplan Test Prep.  “Clearly, an applicant’s digital trail can be an indicator of whether or not he or she possesses this quality.”

Thomas notes, “Despite jokes and negative stereotyping of lawyers, the reality is that the legal community takes ethics among its members very seriously.  You not only have to be accepted to a state bar to practice law, but once you are admitted, unethical behavior can lead to your disbarment, stripping you of your ability to practice.  Not many other professions have that kind of enforceable code of conduct, so it’s natural that law schools screen more stringently and more often.”

In a separate survey of 869 Kaplan Test Prep students who took the October LSAT, 77% objected to having their online personae included as part of the admissions process (although only 15% said that there is something in their personal digital footprint that might negatively affect their application.)  Interestingly, the same percentage – 77% – also said that as future lawyers they should be held to a higher ethical standard than other professionals.

Other survey results from Kaplan Test Prep’s 2011 survey of law school admissions officers:

  • No in-state Admissions Advantage:  85% of admissions officers said that applicants who reside in the state where their law school is located have no advantage over non-resident applicants.
  • Financial Aid: 30% said that the level of financial aid for students increased over the previous year; 10% said the amount has increased; 44% said the amount stayed the same.
  • Class Size: 38% report they decreased the size of its incoming 2011 class over the previous year. 8% said they increased it; 51% say they left it the same.

For more information about Kaplan Test Prep’s survey on the law school admissions landscape, please contact Russell Schaffer at russell.schaffer@kaplan.com or 212.453.7538.

*The survey was conducted by phone in July and August 2011 and included responses from 128 of the nation’s 200 American Bar Association-accredited law schools.

About Kaplan Test Prep

Kaplan Test Prep (www.kaptest.com) is a premier provider of educational and career services for individuals, schools and businesses. Established in 1938, Kaplan is the world leader in the test prep industry. With a comprehensive menu of online offerings as well as a complete array of print books and digital products, Kaplan offers preparation for more than 90 standardized tests, including entrance exams for secondary school, college and graduate school, as well as professional licensing exams for attorneys, physicians and nurses.   Kaplan also provides private tutoring and graduate admissions consulting services.

# # #

10 Comments
October 22, 2011

News 12 Connecticut: “Admissions Officers Checking Out Applicants on Facebook”

October 21, 2011

MBA Podcaster: “GMAT’s New Integrated Reasoning Section Set to Launch in 2012″