LSAT Logical Reasoning: Parallel & Parallel Flaws

LSAT Logical Reasoning: Parallel & Parallel Flaws

Parallel reasoning questions on the LSAT require you to (1) identify the logic and structure of an argument and (2) find an argument with similar logic/structure. For this type of LR question, you will need to look for the patterns in the structure. The argument itself does matter, but a little less than in other LR question types. If you’ve been working on LSAT practice questions, chances are you are already confident with identifying conclusions, evidence, and assumptions and understanding he basic premises of arguments.

To practice this type of LSAT question, you’ll focus a bit more on paraphrasing the stimulus in your own words. This will essentially become your “prediction.” But first, how can you recognize this question type? Look at the wording of the question stems. Here are some you’ll commonly see:

  • Which of the following utilized the same pattern of reasoning as the argument above?
  • Which of the following most closely parallels the above argument?
  • The logic of the above argument is most closely parallel to which of the following?

The key thing to keep in mind is that parallel arguments have parallel flaws. If two arguments are parallel in their logical reasoning, then it is reasonable to guess that the assumptions or flaws they make will be very close.


4 Steps to Solve Parallel Reasoning Questions

  1. Write down the conclusion and the evidence.
  2. Write down the structure symbolically (Evidence, then Conclusion, followed by example).
  3. Eliminate answer choices that doesn’t mirror the structure.
  4. Compare any remaining choices for content.

One question to ask yourself is: is the argument convincing? If the assumptions aren’t weak and the conclusion holds up based on the evidence provided, then the correct answer will ALSO have a strong argument. Weak arguments are parallel with weak arguments, and strong arguments are parallel with strong arguments. Don’t worry whether the subject matter is the same or different. Just because two arguments focus on television syndication rights does NOT mean they are automatically parallel.

Parallel Reasoning Sample Question

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument provided?

Team Captain: Winning requires the willingness to cooperate, which in turn requires motivation. So you will not win if you are not motivated.

Diagram: A  B, B  C. Therefore, -C  -A

A is “winning”, B is “willingness to cooperate”, and C is “motivation”.

Possible Answers and Corresponding Diagrams

A)   Being healthy requires exercise. But exercise involves risk of injury. So, paradoxically, anyone who wants to be healthy will not exercise.

  1. A  B, B C. Therefore A  -B

B)   Learning requires making some mistakes. And you must learn if you are to improve. So you will not make mistakes without there being a noticeable improvement.

  1. A  B, A  C. Therefore –B  C

C)   Our political party will retain its status only if it raises more money. But raising more money requires increased campaigning. So our party will not retain its status unless it increases campaigning.

  1. A  B, B  C. Therefore –C  -A

D)   You can repair your own bicycle only if you are enthusiastic. And if you are enthusiastic you will also have mechanical aptitude. So if you are not able to repair your own bicycle you lack mechanical aptitude.

  1. A  B, B  C. Therefore –A  -C

E)   Getting a ticket requires waiting in line. Waiting in line requires patience. So if you do not wait in line, you lack patience.

  1. A  B, B  C. Therefore –A  -C

As you can see from the diagrams above, the only diagram in an answer that matches that of the argument is answer “C”.  Diagramming the arguments like this is helpful for all of the parallel questions, whether you are asked to match the reasoning or match the flaw.


Expert Tip

It is helpful to use neutral letters like A and B, rather than W for willing and C for cooperation, because the sample answers will not have “winning” but other factors. Using neutral letters will keep you from getting to confused with the terms in the argument and the terms in the answers.

Be patient with yourself with this LSAT question-type – you’ll have to work on 6 arguments total, so this question will take a little longer than you think!

Parallel Flaws

“Flaw” questions on the LSAT can appear in a variety of forms, but all essentially ask you to focus on the same thing: the logical fallacy of the argument. The most common logical flaws are apparent to even the novice law student, but if you find yourself getting some of the harder “Parallel Flaw” questions incorrect on your LSAT practice tests, it may be that your approach needs to be stepped-up to get primed for LSAT Test Day.

The typical “Parallel Flaw” LSAT question asks: “Which one of the following contains a flaw that most closely parallels the flaw contained in the passage?” 

  • Step 1 – Take apart the argument in the passage, using your scratch pad.

    If you don’t fully focus on the argument in the passage first, you can’t even begin to know what is “parallel.” If you’re getting this relatively easy question-type wrong, you’re probably jumping too quickly to the answer choices or failing to utilize your scratch pad. Your notes don’t have to be extensive, but even writing a couple choice words will “firm up” in your brain what the argument’s flaw is, and allow you to better remember it as you weed through the answer choices.

  • Step 2 - Eliminate answer choices that are “obviously” wrong.

    The more exact your understanding is of the given argument’s flaw, the more quickly you’ll be able to weed out the obviously wrong choices. Spend more time up front of the passage, and you’ll breeze through the answer choices. Narrowed it down to two? Move on to Step 3:

  • Step 3 - Carefully compare any remaining choices.

    How are they different in terms of scope, word choice, etc. What is the basis for the flaw in each one? Remember, you are looking for the choice that best mimics the flaw in the argument, so it might not necessarily be the answer choice that is the same format or subject-matter. In fact, it commonly won’t be!


Previous: Logical Reasoning: Flaws and Common Flaws

Next: Logical Reasoning: Strengthen and Weaken